Tag: museums

  • Two American Girls of Cambridge

    Love, work and other English heritage ailments

    Autumn 2013 —

    Cambridge, Cambridgeshire… on the river Cam…

     

    I. A small test of inconvenience


    “Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.”

    The Clown, Twelfth Night
    (Translation: Here, irony is oxygen and sincerity a choking hazard.)

    Most mornings, I rode a white bicycle with a wicker basket and a D-lock — what we’d call a U-lock in the States — through a drizzle so gentle it felt like God had a lingering runny nose. Coming from Utah, where rain is a rare spectacle of thunder and repentance, I never quite adjusted to how punctual it is in England. In the mountain desert, rain happens about as often as people eat green Jell-O (practically never).

    I cycled through the drizzle toward the libraries, down Hills Road toward the center — a punctuation mark in the grey paragraph of morning traffic, weaving close to cars without hitting their mirrors. The colleges would wake up: porters unlocking centuries-old doors, someone eating a “cheeky” sausage roll at a bus stop. I’d loved Cambridge long before I got there, but in England you can’t just say something like that. You have to start by complaining about the weather. It’s as though affection must first pass a small test of inconvenience.

     

    II. Three places, one God complex


    When I told people where I was from, they nodded with that English politeness that means mild confusion. “Utah?” Someone would usually ask, “Near Las Vegas?” — meaning the place British men flock to for stag weekends, armed with inflatable anatomy and the promise of bad decisions.

    In reality, the two cities are six hours apart by car, a straight shot down I-15. Salt City mirroring Sin City across the motorway — the two of them glaring at each other like a separated couple in a bad marriage still sharing a bank account.

    Cambridge has Old World charm — so neatly named it borders on self-parody. There’s a river called the Cam and, of course, a number of bridges. Locals, ever self-aware, like to joke that the name proves genius is in the water. For some, Cambridge was still a finishing school for the world’s most polished: chauffeured to formals, brunching in AirBnB’d castles, posting filtered group pictures under a Hellenistic sculpture on the relatively new app, Instagram, (founded in 2010, acquired by Facebook in 2012).

    Days blurred into drafts and deadlines, the slow rhythm of library lamps and late-night tea. Ambition was its own religion here, quiet but consuming. We scrawled the motto over our doorways: Silent Desperation is the English Way.

     

    III. Shine on, you Cantabrigian diamond


    Syd Barrett and Roger Waters were rumored to have played their first set here when they were fourteen or fifteen at the Anchor Pub. Barrett grew up (and died) in Cambridge. I met coursemates and friends who came to visit at the pub; sometimes I came during lunch, watching the punters on the river. Sometimes I sat by myself in the corner downstairs — listened to music, spent a little time with Syd’s spirit.

    I felt at home, haunting the town as a cultural-anthropologist-to-be with a black wool coat and a funny last name. British people still think Macbeth is unlucky. Sometimes I felt it. Maybe I was living in a fever dream or an Earl Grey delirium… regardless, I was there.

     

    IV. The other American girl


    “If I had my mouth, I would bite; if I had my liberty,
    I would do my liking: in the meantime let me be that I am
    and seek not to alter me.”

    Don John, Much Ado About Nothing
    (Translation: If you can’t beat the algorithm, don’t join it?)

    “Marry, sir, they have committed false report;
    moreover, they have spoken untruths; secondarily,
    they are slanders; sixth and lastly, they have belied a lady;
    thirdly, they have verified unjust things; and, to conclude,
    they are lying knaves.”

    Dogberry, Much Ado About Nothing
    (Translation: Someone on Instagram is lying again.)

    In 2013, her posts reached us like contraband, circulating among the unconcerned nerd girls. She was studying across town, photographing candlelit formals and sun-washed courtyards; her posts slipped into our common rooms like dispatches from a parallel university. She made Cambridge look effortless, like a romantic comedy. Something both brass and totally American, but novel in the brave new world of Instagram filters. Enter Valencia Rock ’n’ Roll from N.Y.C.

    What fascinated me most about Caroline Calloway — with her literary name straight out of Fitzgerald — was the story behind the sparkling façade: the strange duet of authorship and illusion. I watched it all from the Anthropology & Archaeology Library (between fantasizing about Sylvia and Ted), the University Library, the Hughes Hall library. I didn’t feel envy exactly, more like the fascination of seeing someone animate their own myth in real time. She’d translated Cambridge in the 21st century into a vivid image. In many ways, my experience felt like endurance. But then, every myth has someone in the shadows — usually a woman — doing the invisible labor that keeps the illusion intact.

     

    V. Caroline’s chorus: every drama needs its ghost


    The story that broke in 2019 revived the Caroline Cambridge myth that began in 2013, when Caroline and I were students at Cambridge. The story focused on Natalie Beach: they had been best friends in college, collaborators turned co-conspirators in character invention. Natalie later alleged that she had not only helped write the early Instagram captions but had co-created the Caroline persona itself, an uncredited ghostwriter to the myth. Together they built the witty intimacy that made Caroline’s feed so addictive, while Caroline lived it in public: the gowns, the heartbreak, the fantasy of effortless belonging. (Very
    Gossip Girl; yes… I watched it all.)

    That was twelve years ago. And still, in 2025, glossy stories keep appearing — Caroline posed in soft light, telling new versions of the same tale. The fascination endures. When the ghostwriting story broke, I didn’t feel vindicated. I mostly felt curious, and, if I’m honest, a little jealous… of the paid ghostwriter Natalie.*

    My love of psychedelic theater like Dark Side of the Moon and secret Gossip Girl viewing proved I’d always been drawn to spectacle, but I dressed my artistic aspirations as coursework: poetic prose that made academic boards give me grants — or let me take out loans so I could learn more. Back then, I just worked. Didn’t question it.

    *A friend who proofed this essay (male) believes that deep down I wish I were posing in my underwear next to a Beauty & the Beast costume for thousands and thousands of dollars. This repressed intimation of female jealousy, he reckons, is the most interesting idea in the essay.

     

    VI. An honest day’s haunting


    By then, I had started to notice that Cambridge had its share of quiet ghosts: people like me, living in libraries, alone or in company, absorbed enough in our work that we began to fade at the edges. We moved, in light or in darkness, in a kind of near-invisibility; kept vigil for old, tattered stories while others told prettier ones.

    I worked at the Museum of Archaeology & Anthropology on exhibits about disappeared civilizations, and with visiting groups from South Africa, Australia, Nigeria, First Nations, and the Blackfeet Nation. As graduate students, we twenty-somethings met with representatives, listened to stories tied to identity and memory, and learned to care for the objects living at the museum.

    I used to drink coffee from white china cups after lunch, thousand-yard staring out a window overlooking the cricket green. I told people I was agnostic when the Utah question came up, but I also spent hours each week in Cambridge’s churches crying.

    In Turkish restaurants, Muslim-owned grocery stores and malls in the suburbs, where I rented a shared council house, I encountered many other people trying to become something or do something great. I felt privileged, but everyone could see the missing buttons on my coat, stumbling in for real-sugar chocolate at odd hours. 

    Sometimes I wondered if loving a place was just another form of study — an endless observation that never turned into certainty. I wrote about belonging as if naming it might make it real, but Cambridge resisted ownership in the way all beautiful things do. My research, interviews and writing addressed the question: How do we inhabit the places we’re from, those we adopt, those we — lovingly, even masochistically — serve? ’Til death do us part… or not, Dear Cambridge.

    Coleridge might summarize: A Mormon fantasie of eternal love!

     

    VII. Portrait of the artist, post-graduation


    “I can call spirits from the vasty deep.”

    “Why, so can I, or so can any man;
    But will they come when you do call for them?”
    Glendower and Hotspur, Henry IV, Part I
    (Translation: But can you get funding?)

    On Orchard Street in Cambridge in 2018, I rented a small room with my long-time boyfriend, who I’d met years earlier as a master’s student. Outside, bicycles clicked past toward the river; inside, the Medieval rafters exhaled in little sighs and radiators creaked. The ceiling slanted, the air smelled faintly of rain and coffee and the small desk by the window became the site of my artistic evolution, a miraculous spurt of production after years visiting the altar of the Muse of Writing, waiting for a sign.

     

    VIII. Devotion and other British habits


    “I have no other but a woman’s reason; I think him so,
    because I think him so.”

    The Two Gentlemen of Verona
    (Translation: Feeling is its own form of faith.)

    “There’s language in her eye, her cheek, her lip.”
    Troilus and Cressida
    (No translation necessary.)

    A stone’s throw from Orchard Street was the Princess Diana Memorial Garden — a modest town park with practical flowerbeds, nothing exotic — somewhere I used to sit at all hours of the day, cross-legged. Children ran in circles around the benches while parents unwrapped sandwiches, the ordinary rhythm of British weekends. It wasn’t the sort of place anyone photographed, which was what I liked about it.

    For anyone who grew up in the 1990s, her image was everywhere: the ocean-blue eyes, the head tilt, that quiet strength that seemed to glow from television screens and magazine covers alike. In Utah, that admiration had its own peculiar intensity — perhaps because so much of our culture still carried traces of old England, with hymns and hierarchy just a breath removed from High Anglicanism. Loving the Royal Family came easily; devotion to Lady D felt like a shared inheritance. My mom cried for a week when she died. It’s a vivid childhood memory. Blonde, magnetic and naturally elegant, my mom had what people used to call “a Diana-like way about her.” England never felt totally foreign to me: so much of our cultural heritage is close, intimate — even painful — like a family photograph.

    However, different parts of me spared me from imposture syndrome or castigating myself too much in an environment where I was, more often than not, stepping on toes. Maybe it was the Celtic stubbornness or the frontier nostalgia, but I took a quiet pleasure in belonging somewhere I wasn’t supposed to. I was an Irish-Scottish-Swedish-Swiss-Welsh mix from the Wild West — a cultural collage that shouldn’t have blended with Gothic chapels and rowing clubs.

    Yet, walking past King’s on foggy mornings, I felt more local than foreign, more student than visitor, grateful and a little defiant at once. I felt pride when I studied for finals in the Eagle pub, beneath the scorched signatures of RAF and American airmen who had burned their names into the ceiling during the Second World War: a small inheritance of audacity I could recognize in myself.

     

    The cathedral of feedback


    In the morning on Hills Road, I passed tech workers and tourists, each on a different kind of pilgrimage, convinced the next bright screen or cloistered courtyard held meaning. Celebrity, scholarship, capitalism: chapels in the cathedral of feedback. Some heard noise as progress; others were just trying to do good work, live decently and make sense of where they’d ended up.

    Cambridge had a rhythm of its own — oftentimes made judgements about correct ambition and devotion, noise and truth. Some days I thought I understood it; other days it was all confusion. There was comfort in a shared definition of meaning in the midst of tradition, architectural beauty and tantalizing “No Entry” signs everywhere. (Might be my fetish…)

     

    P.S.salm 46:5
    To my Fourth Watch Love

  • Opening a 2012 Time Capsule

    I recently did something that should require protective gear and a signed liability waiver: I opened a writing folder not accessed since September 2012. It did not creak audibly, but it should have.

    This was not just a folder, but a sealed intellectual time capsule, assembled at an age when I believed adjectives improved in proportion to how many of them I stacked, when present tense felt inherently more profound than past, and when every museum visit threatened to become a metaphysical episode.

    The excavation was prompted by my current state of waiting to hear about my first attempt at a PhD application. There are only so many times you can refresh an email inbox before turning to archaeological self-harm, so I went digging.

    My immediate fear upon cracking the seal was not that the writing would be bad. It was worse. That it would be recognizably mine. That after fourteen years, professional detours, and a supposed maturation of voice, I would discover I had not evolved at all: same tonal fingerprints. Same instinct toward poetic, slightly over-layered reflection. Earnestness in similar density to a neutron star. Same desire to make a glass museum floor carry the symbolic weight of Western civilization.

    I worried it might even be more daring than anything I would currently risk publishing in a blog, let alone attaching to an application packet destined for the Gates Cambridge Foundation, whose reviewers, I assume, prefer their ambition tempered and their metaphors well behaved.

    And yet, there is something disarming about the younger voice. It is less cautious. Less aware of genre boundaries. It stands in a museum and immediately attempts to converse with Shakespeare, Ovid, stratigraphy, and cultural memory all at once, without asking permission.

    Which brings me to the entry itself, preserved exactly as it was written, like a ceramic vessel unearthed intact from beneath several layers of academic self-editing:

    And such a wall as I would have you think

    That had in it a crannied hole or chink,

    Through which the lovers, Pyramus and Thisbe,

    Did whisper often, very secretly.

    This loam, this roughcast, and this stone doth show

    That I am that same wall. The truth is so.

    Shakespeare recalls Ovid’s Metamorphoses with a scene of a Wall speaking to King Theseus of Athens in A Midsummer Night’s Dream. 

    I stand in Athens, towering above are the gleaming walls of the new Acropolis Museum, and around me are remnants of rough stone walls, which myth suggests were laid by Theseus. Here I am located at a point that is at once the past and present, a crossroads of my own, Greek, and broader European history. In fact, I stand on a clear glass floor at the entrance of the new Acropolis Museum. In a room beneath my feet is an in-progress excavation, where the systematic removal of soil reveals ancient houses emerging from the strata. The ruins give scientific data about the past, and also relate tales of accumulated cultural meaning. Throughout history, the voices of ancient walls gain new meaning and are reanimated by writers and artists, such as Shakespeare. I have always found the frame performance of Pyramus and Thisbe within A Midsummer Night’s Dream to reflect complex layering of cultural history and the way that objects help us understand it. Ovid’s tale in Latin is fascinating, but Shakespeare’s version explores the tale’s transmission through Classical, Elizabethan, and finally, with our viewing, modern culture. I’ve found in my travel, study of language, and investigation of art, that cultural history is a long narrative, where the continuous accretion of meaning gives material objects, such as Shakespeare’s comical Wall, the ability to speak truths in ever-changing time. As Chris Gosden and Chantal Knowles write in Collecting Colonialism, “objects…are always in a state of becoming, and this is true not just when produced and used in their original cultural context, but once collected and housed in the museum.” Present cultural significance is always built on ancient foundations, and the Acropolis Museum, like a frame story, acknowledges its location in the historical continuum with the invitation for guests to look up at  modern walls and beneath their feet at the stratigraphic past. Museums reflect cultural truths as they act as both repositories of memory and residences for civil discourse about what material culture continues to mean. My layered experiences brought me to Athens, to museums, and to the combination and culmination of all my interests: to the study of material culture and the threshold of a future examining these issues as an academic and museum curator.

     

  • From Cambridge Chapels to Salt Lake’s B’nai Israel Temple

    Composite image

    Yesterday
    I was reminicing about the churches I knew and loved in Cambridge—stone chapels tucked into side streets or towering over intersections, the kind of places that hold memory simply by continuing to stand. Today I’m thinking about another piece of historic architecture much closer to home: the B’nai Israel Temple in Salt Lake City, where the Salt Lake Art Museum (SLAM) is beginning to take shape. I recently published
    an article
    about the building’s long history and its new institutional future. The thread between the two posts is preservation—how inherited spaces carry memory, and what it means when a community chooses to keep or discard the places that define it.

    The Tragedy of the Pantages Theater

    My interest in preservation became personal during the Utah Pantages Theatre debacle in 2021, when I researched, wrote, and anonymously published an article about the zero-dollar deal that handed a nationally significant 1918 theatre to developers for demolition
    (read it in SLUG).
    The story had been in the news for a while and continue to gain traction, written up by multiple reporters at The Salt Lake Tribune and elsewhere. Months later, I learned that the Mayor’s office had contacted SLUG asking about the author behind the piece—an unexpected development that sharpened the sense of risk many preservation advocates already felt. When the city ultimately went through with the demolition during the pandemic, I remember standing on Main Street and looking at the cleared site where the theatre had stood.

    Composite image

    What followed has only underscored the loss. The redevelopment tower promised in exchange for tearing down the theatre has yet to materialize. According to
    recent reporting,
    the property has been cleared and is being used as a temporary surface parking lot while the high-rise project remains stalled. The developer has requested paving and interim-use approvals, and the site continues to sit empty—an absence rather than a new beginning.

    In the words of the Salt Lake Tribune, the theatre was “torn down in 2022 … to make way for a parking lot,” a bitter outcome when the city gave up a historic landmark and a (rumored to be) priceless Tiffany skylight, taken from the site before the demolition. The RDA has been rebranded the CRA, with no mention of the name change on the city’s websites.

    Composite image
    Composite image

    One Success Story

    Against that backdrop, the work happening at the B’nai Israel Temple feels like a rare counterexample. Instead of another teardown or another “too expensive to save” narrative, the building is being restored in a way that reconnects it to the community that built it. SLAM’s founder, art historian Micah Christensen—whose family operates Anthony’s Fine Art & Antiques just a few blocks away—has rooted the museum’s vision in the building’s layered cultural history, and in the relationships his family has maintained within the area for generations
    (more in the 15 Bytes article).
    The museum’s presence inside the old sanctuary weaves together family history, art, and the cultural life of the neighborhood. It’s a reminder that preservation can be generative—not just resistance to loss, but a way of making room for future stories inside an inherited space.

    Preservation always sits somewhere between memory and power. Cambridge taught me that some places endure because whole communities quietly steward them. Salt Lake taught me that some buildings require a public fight, and that those fights sometimes come with unexpected personal costs. The B’nai Israel Temple—and the work SLAM is beginning inside it—offers a different model: a moment where the city, the institution, and the community align long enough to let history remain visible. After watching the Pantages reduced to a cleared lot awaiting a project that still hasn’t begun, that alignment feels worth noting.