Tag: americana

  • Calumet: Layers in Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining

    Calumet cans symbolic opening image

    I’ve always found that my strongest connection to Macbeth comes through horror—an angle that feels surprisingly overlooked, given how often the play leans toward the campy, the uncanny, and the animated in its shifts of tone. Macbeth sits quietly at the foundation of the genre, yet most modern adaptations treat it as a straightforward story of political unraveling, closer to Henry VIII than to anything resembling proto-horror.

    It was this elasticity of tone that drew me, years later, to Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining, a film that treats horror the way Shakespeare does—as an atmospheric logic rather than a genre, something woven through space, timing, and the emotional weather of a place.

    Macbeth reaches toward a kind of supernatural tension and psychological disorientation that wouldn’t have a formal vocabulary for centuries. Shakespeare mixed genres, but film adaptations rarely capture the quick shifts of atmosphere that live theater makes possible—the in-and-out changes of set and mood that can feel like flipping channels on a strange television broadcast, or listening to a radio station mixed in real time by an unseen DJ.

    1990s animated Black Cauldron style reference

    “Come, Graymalkin!” — the line holds an eerie shimmer like the dark animated films from the late ’80s-90s. They’re threaded with folk magic, shadowy forests, grotesque little jokes, and a touch of menace too sophisticated for their intended audience. See The Black Cauldron (1985) promo image above.

    At its core, Macbeth is a play of tonal whiplash: ragged prophecies delivered on a blasted heath, followed moments later by a drunken porter cracking bawdy jokes at the castle gate; flashes of supernatural spectacle punctuating long, politically anxious speeches; strange bursts of color — torches, blood, banners — interrupting Scotland’s fog. Shakespeare’s tragedy is not one clean descent but a jittery collage of horror, comedy, and moral vertigo. It behaves less like stately history and more like early camp horror, the kind that delights in theatricality while letting the uncanny slip in through the seams.

    Living Inside a Haunted World

    Kubrick understood that texture instinctively. Where Shakespeare used rhetorical shifts, Kubrick used décor, framing, and the rhythm of movement through space. His haunted world is not a set of plot devices but an environment you live inside. The Overlook behaves like a theatrical stage expanded to architectural scale: carpets in impossible colors, hallways that seem to inhale and exhale, sudden intrusions of grotesque comedy (the man in the dog suit, the relentless cheer of the bar), all arranged to make the viewer feel not that they are watching a haunted hotel, but that they have been quietly checked into one.

    The rules of realism loosen and tighten at odd intervals—just as in Macbeth—and that playfulness with tone is what gives both works their durability. Horror becomes a lens, not a genre: a way of understanding mood, memory, and the fractures in our perception.

    Maybe that’s why Room 237—Rodney Ascher’s documentary built from the voices of Kubrick theorists who never appear onscreen—has become my favorite documentary. I rewatched it last night, and it still carries the same strange, absorbing quality it had the first time. The film allows you to wander back through Kubrick’s environments, touching the walls, following the impossible geography, noticing small shifts in color and continuity the way a guest might sense a draft in a sealed room.

    237

    The disembodied commentators move through those spaces like resident spirits—guides who never quite manifest—letting their interpretations drift between the improbable and the unexpectedly revealing. Their voices echo over long, immaculate stretches of footage from The Shining, Eyes Wide Shut, and Kubrick’s earlier films, until the documentary begins to feel less like analysis and more like haunting. For anyone attuned to Kubrick’s sensibility, the film’s rhythm settles in quietly, as if it has been waiting for you to return.

    The Rooms We Return To

    Colorado landscape placeholder

    Last month, I wrote about my mother’s attempt to buy a small business and acred property just outside the Black Canyon of the Gunnison — one of those rare corners of Colorado that feels both remote and instantly magnetic. I connected to the land far more quickly than I expected: the stillness, the open sky, the way the air cools as the canyon drops away. I had already begun imagining the winter there — skiing Telluride on weekends, learning the slower rhythms of the towns tucked into that landscape.

    We were set to arrive on October 31st, Halloween. The timing gave the whole experience a kind of playful electricity—packing boxes, sketching out plans, and sensing that faint atmospheric tilt that comes right before entering a new story. It had the early-Shining quality of anticipation rather than dread, a sense of stepping into a place that felt both familiar and a little uncanny.

    Then the government shutdown halted the federal paperwork the sale depended on, closing the door as abruptly as it had opened. When I watched Room 237 again last night, the footage from The Shining carried the kind of clarity that only arrives after you’ve witnessed something life-altering—like Rowling’s moment in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, when Harry suddenly sees the thestrals, creatures that had been there all along but invisible to him until he had witnessed death.

    Symbolic Doorways and Ruptures

    Dopey sticker disappearing placeholder

    In Room 237, the documentary hinges on a small but important thematic arc: the shift from Danny’s innocence to his initiation. One narrator lingers on the Dopey Disney sticker on Danny’s bedroom door—“he’s ignorant, or a dope”—marking the before moment of a child who hasn’t yet been shown the world’s darker layers. Later, when Tony—Danny’s finger and his inner voice—reveals the vision of blood pouring from the Overlook’s elevator doors, everything changes. That image becomes the after: the moment when he is forcefully given knowledge, or a new reality, that he can’t return from.

    Tellingly, the Dopey sticker quietly disappears by the time his worried mother and the pediatrician sit discussing his strange behavior—its absence a small but unmistakable sign that the threshold has been crossed.

    Clockwork fire engine placeholder

    Something the Stephen King book captures better than the film is the Overlook as a wind-up mechanism of its own — part snowglobe, part labyrinth. Danny’s presence doesn’t just perceive the hotel; it activates it, winds it into motion. Kubrick gestures toward this in his opening aerial shot: a benevolent, almost angelic vantage point following the car through the mountains, as if some unseen witness is watching over Wendy and Danny as they approach a building already preparing itself.

    Colorado’s Unquiet Ground

    Overlook symbolic placeholder

    Environments and landscapes are living things. They hold competing interpretations, overlapping needs, and layers of history that rarely agree with each other. Kubrick understood this instinctively. In The Shining, he suggests the repressed and the grief-stricken without accusation—introducing the violence beneath the Overlook, including the history of Native genocide and displacement, not as a lesson but as an atmosphere. He allows the viewer to slip into the world as a local might: aware of something unsettled beneath the surface, but also aware of the beauty and strangeness that coexist alongside it. From what I’ve read, Kubrick learned things while researching in Colorado that stayed with him and haunted him—difficult histories that reframed the landscape in ways he didn’t expect.

    I’ve only scratched the surface of that material myself, but I understand the feeling: how the trauma embedded in a place can be almost drowned out by the sweep of desert sky, the brightness of high-altitude light, the resilient life of the region. For Kubrick, the Overlook wasn’t just a set—it was a door to secret knowledge, and stepping through it was its own kind of initiation, as horrifying as it was illuminating.

    Erasing the Image, Losing the Memory

    Overlook symbolic placeholder

    I’ve long questioned the wisdom of removing Native American imagery—especially Native-produced brands and symbols—from public view, whether in sports or on packaging. Erasure solves nothing; it tears something vital away from cultural memory. We lose an opportunity for shadow work, for reckoning with dark heritage, when we strip away the images that remind us of the histories beneath our feet. Symbols need room to exist in a neutral space so they can be understood, not feared or hidden. Without that, we risk weakening our collective imagination—and our ability to remain mentally healthy in the face of the past.

    Colorado has always complicated these questions for me. It is one of the few places where I feel the beauty of horror without flinching—where the land itself teaches you how to hold darkness and radiance at the same time. The high desert has a way of making even grief look illuminated: red rock catching fire at sunset, abandoned mining sites dissolving into wildflower meadows, old histories rising and fading in the same breath.

    Each time I’ve lived near or traveled through Colorado, I’ve felt that double vision settle in—the sense that a place can be breathtaking and wounded at once, and that my role is not to sanitize that tension but to sit with it. Horror, in its best form, does the same thing: it lets the truth stand in its full shape, neither prettied up nor pushed away. Maybe that’s why I return to The Shining so often. Its terror is threaded with beauty, and its beauty refuses to hide the cost of what it remembers. Colorado feels like that too: a landscape that insists on being seen whole.

  • Locks’s Glass Onion

    My college room at the University of Utah, 2010
    My college room at the University of Utah, 2010

    I’ve had a long and multifaceted relationship with the Beatles, and nothing makes me happier than talking through the songs themselves: which ones people love, which ones people genuinely hate, and why. It’s one of my favorite conversations to have, “full stop.”

    People attach themselves to certain tracks for reasons that feel almost archaeological—childhood car rides, the first chords they learned, the moment they realized music might shape their lives. Those memories stack up until the songs become part of their own record. The Beatles’ catalog turned into both an American time capsule (sorry Brits) and a global one, familiar to people who grew up oceans apart.

    People who can’t stand the Beatles reveal something too, and the force of that dislike is part of the story. The hard rejection, especially among millennials and the generations that followed, comes with its own code: nose-upturning at “pop music,” purity tests, the need to stand outside whatever feels canonical.

    I. The Domestic Universe: From “Octopus’s Garden” to Ram

    I grew up in a small world of homeschooling circles, Montessori classrooms, and public libraries where children’s music was having a moment. Raffi was part of a larger movement of artists making development-focused songs meant to nurture curiosity and imagination. “Banana Phone” became my personal toddler theme song because my real name rhymes with Banana (also “like Montana”).

    “Octopus’s Garden” and “Yellow Submarine” were kid songs, and the question coming out of the 70s was “Why wouldn’t you write songs for kids?” They had the playful, bright, imaginative spirit, geared toward building inner worlds. At library singalongs, Beatles tracks lived right next to “Baby Beluga.”

    It was a childhood inside the progressive Left, and no matter what I think about how politics in the US has devolved, I still know exactly where the grandmas from Vermont and the aunts from the suburbs of Colorado made their core memories. The Beatles were folded into that, aligned with the softer, idealistic side of the 1960s that suburban liberals still cling to and think is compatible with the LGBTQIA+ movement (lol).

    Me on a swing as a kid.
    I pretty much dress like this to this day.

    There are cultures, especially in Italy and South America, where the domestic world of mothers and children is treated as a sacred space—a universe of Marian art so beautiful it can move you to tears when you see the sculptures at the center of French, Italian, or Spanish cathedrals.

    In the United States, this world is often mocked or dismissed, and I’m positive that this cultural disdain is reflected in the growing language erasure around motherhood. I sometimes think the fiercest Beatles hate comes from people who never felt at home in that early domestic universe of bright colors and snotty-nosed kids at singalong: the goofy, the “non-sexual.”

    Part of the Beatles’ legacy that’s impossible to deny is Paul and Linda McCartney’s Ram—my pandemic album of choice, played on my little Victrola in my 2020 apartment at 9th and 9th. The record feels like the domestic counter-melody to all of it, a rural masterpiece that honors partnership, motherhood, kids, animals, and the rhythms of farm life.

    A quiet domestic corner with records and devotional imagery.

    II. Here Comes the Sun King’s Shadow

    Because I was raised with brothers and was, on my mom’s side, the eldest grandchild, I developed a bossy streak that everyone found hilarious when I was small. My snazzy, upper-middle-class grandparents would fly in from Arizona, take me to the Children’s Museum; later showing their friends photos of me shoving little boys out of the way to get on top of a monster truck. However, my extremely conservative, whole-wheat-bread-baking stepmom thought it was a very bad omen.

    To be fair, I did go through brief phases of biting, scratching, choking, and kicking in elementary school—little spikes of chaos that made adults wonder what kind of creature I was becoming.

    A quiet domestic corner with records and devotional imagery.

    This was also the era when I refused to let my mom (a hairdresser) comb my hair, so she finally cut it into the rounded, symmetrical style we called “the Danny Torrence special.” It’s still one of the great family jokes. Around the same time, she bought the Abbey Road CD, one of the few I could slip into her yellow-and-black Walkman.

    I already adored Bugs Bunny and every form of slapstick—anvils, dynamite, frying pans to the face—so “Maxwell’s Silver Hammer” convinced me that violence was funny in a way adults secretly understood, even if they pretended to be above cartoon mayhem.

    If the Beatles could sing about cheerful little murders, it meant I wasn’t a bad kid for loving the rhythm and absurdity of violent media; I liked the heightened, stylized spectacle, but felt guilty or like there was something “un-girlish” about that. I (mostly) outgrew real-life violence, but anyone with an enduring love for Kill Bill knows exactly what I mean.

    i. Violence, Chaos, and Danger in the Beatles — The Little Girl’s Starter Pack

    • “Happiness Is a Warm Gun” — The White Album
    • “I Want You (She’s So Heavy)” — Abbey Road
    • “Oh! Darling” — Abbey Road
    • “Come Together” — Abbey Road
    • “Why Don’t We Do It in the Road?” — The White Album
    • “Helter Skelter” — The White Album
    • John’s scream songs (“Yer Blues,” “Twist and Shout,” the proto–primal scream)

    III. Abbey Road to Anthropology

    On a Hawai‘i trip when I was fifteen, Abbey Road played through the speakers of my grandparents’ car as we crossed the island, lava fields in the distance and the long dark highway ahead of us. Near sunset, we pulled up close to the observatory, the sky throwing out one last explosion of color before the stars began to appear. We stepped out into the cold air and looked down at the cloud sea spread out like another planet.

    Then we looked up through a giant telescope at Antares, the red heart of Scorpius, burning clear against the night.

    An observatory above a sea of clouds on Maunakea at sunset.

    My connection to Abbey Road crosses with what I was starting to understand about the island and its history. My grandpa Jeff was an architect (or something similar) at Hokuli‘a, a development on the Big Island creating a luxury community. Jeff contributed to through his Japanese-inspired minimalist designs for mansions overlooking the ocean on a jaw-dropping coastline.

    I was learning the story of the development from the kids my age who lived there. This is something I’m trying to capture in these blogs: that the moments and sources that inform knowledge and meaning drastically shape the way you perceive information. The kids and my grandma, although the topic was taboo, told me what the land meant and how sacred burial grounds from the Bronze Age (or thereabouts) had been found, why the lawsuits mattered, and how often white people imagined blank acreage instead of a place shaped by lineage, stewardship, and memory.

    My grandparents were old-school Democrats who integrated into the small community as much as anyone tied to a development project could. They were not naïve about the tension, and they did not pretend it wasn’t there. The experience, seeing the situation from multiple angles, inspired me to pursue anthropology later.

    IV. Runaways, Girlhood, and “She’s Leaving Home”

    “She’s Leaving Home” came into my life in high school, when I was reading poems like Margaret Atwood’s “you fit into me” and starting to recognize the darker truths that settle in early for girls. High school is when you begin to see that “teen girls” are often viewed in a binary of boring and obedient or highly sexualized and cartoony.

    Alternate modes can become uncomfortable for people, and when you fall outside those easy categories, you’re forced to confront all the strange contradictions of “girlhood”—being the gossiped-about lead character in the soap opera version of your life. It’s the stage when escape becomes more than a metaphor, and you catch yourself wanting to leave not just your circumstances but the whole planet and the entire human script altogether.

    A sad doge meme used as a visual stand-in for teenage melancholy.

    The teenage runaway is a theme I return to again and again in my art. I gravitate toward characters like Effy Stonem in Skins because they captured that tension: the push and pull between belonging and disappearance, between being watched and wanting to vanish.

    “She’s Leaving Home” is a song I’d never have predicted I’d like. It caught me off guard. The Beatles were emblematic of the 1960s runaway generation, but here they were writing from the viewpoint of the parents, the people left standing in the doorway after she ran away. Their voices rise through the arrangement like a Greek chorus: bewildered, aching, trying to understand the shape of a departure they didn’t choose.

    Effy Stonem from Skins, looking away, suspended between presence and disappearance.

    Which left me with a question I couldn’t shake: why did a group of very young men choose this vantage point? Why write about the runaway girl from inside the parents’ fear instead of the glamour of the girl’s escape? That choice felt strangely mature, almost dissonant with their public mythology. It suggested they understood the runaway not as an icon but as a daughter embedded in a social world—family, community, expectations, the fragile networks adolescence can fracture.

    V. Beatles Songs That Changed Shape Over Time

    i. “Dear Prudence” and the Rishikesh Lens

    “Dear Prudence” never landed for me until I learned the context. During the Beatles’ stay at Maharishi Mahesh Yogi’s ashram, Prudence Farrow isolated herself so intensely that Lennon wrote the song to coax her back into the world. With that in mind, the simplicity of the song becomes a kind of pastoral caretaking, not a repetition for its own sake.

    ii. Listening Beyond Earth: “Across the Universe”

    “Across the Universe” changed shape for me in a similar way. It wasn’t until after my own time in the desert—and reading more about the India period—that the song opened up. Its suspended, drifting structure echoes “Here, There and Everywhere,” but pulled toward the edges of spacetime. It’s now one of my favorite songs.

    A quiet domestic corner with records and devotional imagery.

    iii. Falling in Love with the Schizoid

    There were songs I couldn’t reconcile with at all. I still don’t like “Everybody’s Got Something to Hide Except Me and My Monkey,” and “Savoy Truffle” never settled for me either. For a long time I dismissed much of The White Album because the contrasts felt too abrupt—bright pop beside deliberately strange distortion.

    “Julia” was the first one that changed for me. “Honey Pie” followed after hearing the Pixies cover, which so captures the range and depth potential of the Beatles catalog. And then “Long, Long, Long” became the center point. It arrived during a chaotic, formative stretch in my life, when Elliott Smith and the quietest Led Zeppelin songs were the core of my listening.

    iv. Eternal Sunshine of the Rearranging Harrison House

    A quiet domestic corner with records and devotional imagery.

    The older I get, the more “Long, Long, Long” feels less like a song and more like a house I keep rediscovering—rooms shifting, a held breath in the wood. Every time I return to it, I hear a new vibration, a new ache that wasn’t there before. Built on restraint and resonance, it feels private and unguarded, as if Harrison left it open for us to wander through.

    It waited for me, the way great art does, until I became someone who could hear it. That’s how I fell in love with George Harrison… became his “Soft-Hearted Hana.”